Raven-Scout/scout-plugin
5 stars · Last commit 2026-06-14
Autonomous daily briefing for Claude Code that cross-checks Slack, Gmail, Calendar, Linear & GitHub — so nothing falls through the cracks, and you can trust what it surfaces.
README preview
# Scout > **The autonomous daily briefing that cross-checks all your work tools — so nothing falls through the cracks, and you can trust what it surfaces.** <p align="center"> <img src="docs/assets/scout-demo.svg" alt="A Scout morning briefing: action items cross-checked across Gmail, Slack, Calendar, GitHub and Linear, each tagged by confidence — with a source contradiction surfaced for the user instead of guessed" width="100%"> </p> Scout runs unattended as scheduled [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) sessions. It reads Slack, Calendar, Gmail, Linear, GitHub, and meeting transcripts; cross-checks every finding against the others; and each morning hands you a short list of what actually needs you — every item tagged by how many sources confirm it. What you get is a persistent, interlinked knowledge base you can browse in Obsidian, and a daily action list you can trust *because you can see its work*. You shouldn't have to manually reconcile what happened across seven tools yesterday, what's still pending from last week, or what changed while you were in meetings. Scout does it — and when your tools disagree, it flags the contradiction instead of quietly picking a side. ## Why Scout is different Readable-markdown memory, scheduled runs, and a self-improvement loop are table stakes now — every serious agent has them. Scout's difference is what it does *before* it tells you anything: - **It cross-checks.** No single tool is treated as the truth. A calendar invite is verified against the transcript; a Linear ticket against the PR; an email against Slack. Claims only one source supports are flagged, not asserted. - **It shows its confidence.** Every entry is tagged — `verified` (2+ sources), `single-source`, `unverified`, `stale`, or `contradicted`. You always know how much weight to give it. - **It's structured, not just stored.** A formal knowledge graph — typed people, projects, tasks, and relationships you can actually query — not a flat pile of notes. - **It surfaces disagreement.** When your sources conflict, that contradiction *is* the signal. Scout shows you both sides instead of guessing which is right.