sup3x/claude-code-eco
26 stars · Last commit 2026-07-02
Eco mode for Claude Code. /eco: -31% to -73% output tokens with critical findings intact; /eco-max: up to -75% with lowered effort. Measured hardest on Claude Fable 5 (fable5), deep-studied on Sonnet 5, works on Opus 4.8 too. We publish our negative results. 82 raw benchmark runs.
README preview
# claude-eco — eco mode for Claude Code **Claude Code spends your money on work you never asked for: re-reading files it just edited, pasting back diffs it already applied, writing three-paragraph reports for two-line fixes. I measured every token of it, deleted it, and published all 82 raw runs — including the ones where I lose.** *Measured hardest on Claude Fable 5 — the hungriest configuration that ever existed — and tuned for every effort-based Claude. `/eco`: −31% to −73% output tokens depending on task and effort level (−63% mean on the flagship n=5 study), with critical findings intact and all produced fixes executed and verified. `/eco-max`: up to −75% by dialing reasoning effort down — opt-in, labeled.* [](LICENSE) [](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills) [](benchmarks/results.md) [Results](#measured-results) · [Install](#install) · [Usage](#usage) · [Benchmarks](benchmarks/results.md) · [FAQ](#faq)  The waste isn't occasional — it repeats on **every turn of every session**, which is why usage limits evaporate and API bills surprise you. **claude-eco** deletes it with two skills: - **`/eco`** — frugality rules with a non-negotiable quality floor. Full reasoning depth preserved. - **`/eco-max`** — the same rules plus a **low reasoning-effort override** for routine chores. Effort is the single biggest token lever on modern Claude models (Fable 5, Sonnet 5, Opus 4.8), and of every terse-mode tool we surveyed, this is the only one we found that touches it. **What that means in practice:** verbose answers shrink 2–4×, replies come back up to 3× faster (30s → 10–15s, measured), and the same weekly limit simply lasts longer — same model, same fixes, minus the padding. ## See the difference